Wednesday, April 3, 2019

New York Rabbi’s Funeral: The “Nazi Death Camp” Survivor Who was Never Even in a Concentration Camp, and Who was Only Ever Arrested by the Communists

The huge funeral of famous New York Rabbi Yisroel Avrohom Portugal has provided yet another example of the outrageous lies which the media perpetuates about the holocaust—in this case, claiming that he “survived the Nazi death camps,” even though he was never in any camp whatsoever, and in fact was only ever detained by Communists after the war.

The funeral of Rabbi Portugal, who died recently aged 95, was attended by tens of thousands of wailing Hasidic Jews in Brooklyn—but the media coverage of that event and his life provided the grotesque exaggerations which have become typical of any coverage of World War II.

First off the mark was The Jewish Press, which set the tone for the rest of the media. The Jewish Press is a weekly newspaper in New York, and describes itself as “America's Largest Independent Jewish Weekly.”

According to that newspaper’s article,titled “Skulener Rebbe, zt’l, is Laid to Rest,” Rabbi Portugal was “Born in Romania to the previous Skulener Rebbe, Rabbi Eliezer Zusia Portugal zt’l and Rebetzin Shayna Rochel, the Rebbe came to the United States as an immigrant together with his father in 1960 after having survived the Nazi death camps in World War II.”

This claim was then instantly repeated by the rest of the media. The Daily Mail, in its extensive coverage of the Rabbi’s funeral (“Tens of thousands of HasidicJews crowd Brooklyn streets for funeral of popular rabbi, 95, who survived theHolocaust and despised the internet—and no one with a smartphone could touchthe coffin”) announced that “the popular Rabbi had survived the Nazi death camps and came to the United States in 1960.”

ABC News’s local broadcaster, Eyewitness News ABC 7, followed up in its coverage (“Thousands crowd Brooklyn streets for grand rabbi's funeral; 2officers hurt”) by repeating this claim that “The rabbi came to the United States in the 1960s after surviving Nazi death camps and was a mainstay in Borough Park and Williamsburg for decades.”

News12 Brooklyn’s coverage (“Thousands line the streets ofBorough Park for rabbi's funeral”) claimed that the “rebbe survived the Holocaust and went on to lead the Skulen synagogue for many years.”

USA Today’s coverage was provided by its local affiliate, the Rockland/Westchester Journal News, (“Large crowds mourned rebbe in Monsey today”) which said that “According to the Jewish Press, Portugal was born in Romania, in what is now Moldova, and immigrated to the United States with his father, Rabbi Eliezer Zusia Portugal, in 1960 after surviving the Holocaust death camps and an imprisonment by Romanian authorities for teaching Torah. The United Nations and U.S. officials intervened on their behalf to have them released.”

However, the Jewish Daily Forward—a “left wing” Jewish paper in New York, inadvertently exposed all these controlled media claims as lies. As the Daily Forward’s headline accurately revealed (“The Last Holocaust-Era Rebbe Dies, And ANeighborhood Shuts Down To Mourn”), Rabbi Portugal was never in a concentration camp, and was never even detained by the Germans during the war.

The Daily Forward revealed that “Portugal and his father left Sculeni, the community in Moldova from which their sect derives its name, before the outbreak of the Second World War.

“They spent the war in the Ukrainian city of Chernowitz, facing persecution there from both the Germans and the Soviets, who occupied the city at different times.
“After the war they traveled to Bucharest, Romania, where they sought and cared for Jewish war orphans, and aided the small remaining Jewish communities. Portugal’s father was arrested multiple times by the Soviets, who occupied Romania until 1968.
“In April of 1959, Romanian authorities arrested both Portugal and his father for suspected treason. Jewish groups in the U.S. raised concerns about the arrest. According to a 1960 report from the Jewish Telegraphic Agency, United Nations officials intervened to secure the release of the two rabbis, and the U.S. State Department offered them citizenship. They were released in September of 1959, and arrived in the U.S. in August of 1960.”

In other words, Rabbi Portugal never even saw a concentration camp, much less “survived a death camp” and was ever only detained by the Communists.

Even though the facts are readily available, the media chose instead—as always—to simply repeat the outrageous lies.

This is in keeping with their standard line on the holocaust, which is to just repeat the “six million murdered” story no matter what the facts might show, hoping that endless repetition will smother any counter arguments.

The media quoted above will also never “retract” or “correct” their lies, another typical tactic of just leaving an “impression,”something which is another long-standing ploy in their holocaust story-tellingtechnique.

Tuesday, November 13, 2018

Stutthof Trial: Former Guard Never Saw “Gas Chambers” or Atrocities

The 94-year-old former SS man who served as a guard at the Stutthof camp has told the court that during his two years’ service he never saw a “gas chamber” or atrocities at the camp—a truthful statement because there was no “gas chamber” at that camp, only a clothing disinfection chamber.

 Johann Rehbogen—who can only be identified as “Johann R” in German media—adopted the usual tactic of those being prosecuted in Germany for being camp personnel—that of not contesting that atrocities took place (a defense which is illegal in Germany) but rather just saying that they never saw or took part in any such activities.

A report of Rehbogen’s 18-page statement to the court, as carried in the Allgemeine Zeitung newspaper, confirmed this in its (blatantly biased) opening paragraph, where the journalist wrote that the defendant was “not remembering anything which could be dangerous.”

Rehbogen is accused of “aiding and abetting” murder in “hundreds of cases,” including the “gassing” of 100 Polish prisoners in June 1944.  Although he “does not deny being in the camp,” he says he “neither heard anything nor was involved” in any of the “crimes, the atrocities, and the murders,” the Allgemeine Zeitung said.

His statement said that he was conscripted into the SS in 1942, and while at the camp, saw the “poor conditions of the prisoners” and also “saw corpses” but knew nothing of the “crimes, the murders, the gas chamber, the shooting-in- the-neck system [of execution].”

In 1944 he was transferred out to the Western front where he served for the rest of the war, his statement ended.

Rehbogen’s denial of ever having seen a “gas chamber” at Stutthof is correct: there was no “gas chamber” at that camp, merely a small clothing disinfection chamber located close to the small camp crematorium.

This is also why the media coverage of the trial will make reference to “gas chambers” but will general shy away from showing pictures of the “gas chamber”—because it is so patently not one, despite visitors to the camp being told that it was one.

The fact that Rehbogen has denied ever seeing a “gas chamber” or any mass executions is however bad news for the Holocaust Storytellers, as they were hoping that this trial—perhaps one of the last ever—would produce a “confession.”

Obviously, it has not.

Tuesday, November 6, 2018

94-Year-old German to Go On Trial for Operating Clothes Disinfection Chamber at Stutthoff Camp

A 94-year-old German, identified as Johann R., a retired landscape architect from North Rhine-Westphalia, has been put on trial for “war crimes” at the Stutthof concentration camp during World War II—including “gassings” in a “gas chamber” which is obviously a clothing disinfection unit.

A report in the Deutsche Welle—a German government controlled news service—announced that a “former SS guard at a concentration camp, charged with aiding and abetting hundreds of murders, is standing trial in Münster's district court.”

The DW report goes on to state that the Stutthof camp is “less well known” than Auschwitz or the other camps, but doesn’t say why.

“According to the indictment, the guard is accused of aiding and abetting hundreds of murders. In June 1944, SS members murdered more than 100 Polish prisoners in the Stutthof gas chamber using the poison gas Zyklon B, while at least 77 wounded Soviet prisoners of war were killed a short time later using the same method,” the DW report says.

"As part of the so-called 'Final Solution of the Jewish Question,' SS members killed an unknown number of Jewish prisoners — probably several hundred — from August to the end of 1944, both in the gas chamber and in the wagons of the narrow-gauge railroad that led into the camp," reads the indictment.

The problem with the indictment is, as pointed out by David Cole, a Jewish holocaust revisionist most famous for being the first to get the camp administration in Auschwitz to admit that the “gas chamber” on display at that camp was built after the war, the Stutthof “gas chamber” is not actually a gas chamber but actually a clothing disinfection station.

Cole wrote:

“The interior of the delousing chamber shows to this day the evidence of its use as that: its walls are marked inside and out with the blue staining that comes from repeated Zyklon B usage.

“The delousing chamber as a stove outside the front door—to heat the chamber before the clothes were put in with the Zyklon-B pellets—and inside the chamber there is a clay heating conduit which runs the length of one wall.  The Zyklon pellets would be placed on the heating conduit, and the stove would be fired up. The conduit would become hot, and the granules would release their gas. The two doors would then be opened for natural ventilation.

“This is an ‘old style’ Zyklon B delousing chamber, built before the more modern chambers, like the ones at Dachau, were designed (the newer, more energy efficient chambers came equipped with Zyklon evaporators, which would heat the granules on a kind of hot plate, and blow the gas onto the clothes, mattresses. This was more energy efficient because it was a waste of fuel to heat an entire when it was only the Zyklon granules that needed to be warmed up. These Zyklon evaporators remain at Dachau today, in the delousing chambers of “Barrack X.”).

“The ‘evidence’ of homicidal usage of the Stutthof gas chamber is a ‘Zyklon B induction hole’ in the roof. We are told that the Zyklon would be poured in through this hole on the heads of the unsuspecting victims. The roof of this chamber is accessible only via ladder.”

Cole goes on to point to say  that the Stutthof Museum personnel say that this was first and foremost a delousing chamber, used as such for years, only later “converted” into a homicidal one.

“Now, let’s ask some questions,” Cole continued:

“1) The Stutthof “gas chamber” has a large floor drain right in the middle of the room, directly below the ‘Zyklon B induction hole.’ Any granules dropped through this hole would automatically go right down the drain. What’s more, the floor of this room is depressed in the middle, where the drain is, so that any water or, in this case, Zyklon granules, would automatically roll into the drain.

“What would stop the Zyklon granules from going down the drain, since they were being poured into the room directly over this drain? And, if a few granules missed the drain, wouldn’t they simply roll, or couldn’t the inmates brush them, down the drain?

“2) The roof of this room is low enough so that a tall person could reach up and block the ‘Zyklon B induction hole.’ However, the thoughtful Nazis, by installing the heating conduit that runs the length of on wall, have made it possible for anyone, of whatever height, to stand on this conduit and block the hole.

“What would stop the inmates from blocking the ‘Zyklon B induction hole,’ especially since they would be expecting foul play (this room was the official Stutthof delousing chamber, known as such by all the inmates. No Stutthof inmate would expect to be given a ‘shower’ in this room, and indeed the Stutthof Museum makes no claims about such a deception (neither do the eyewitnesses)?

“3) Why was this building—a clear ‘proof’ of Nazi crimes, what with its “Zyklon B induction hole,”— not destroyed as the Nazis evacuated the camp? Amazingly, the crematorium right next door was blown up, and, in fact, one side of the gas chamber building was actually hit by shrapnel from the exploding crematorium.
“Why would the Nazis blow up the crematorium, yet leave the ‘homicidal’ gas chamber standing?

“4) Since personal testimony is all we have to go on regarding the homicidal usage of this chamber, and since much of this testimony also mentions the ‘human soap’—which has long been officially debunked— what evidence do we have that the testimony about the Stutthof homicidal gas chamber is any more reliable than the testimony about the human soap?”

* The “human soap” story—which is also associated with the Stutthof camp, has of course been debunked as a lie by the official holocaust historians themselves. 

This “soap from Jews” myth is openly acknowledged as such by all Jewish sources as well, for example, the Jewish Virtual Library (run by the American-Israeli Cooperative Enterprise), has been forced to engage in “damage control” on the matter to try and limit what it calls giving “ the Holocaust deniers any opportunity.”

The Jewish Virtual Library’s admission that the “soap from Jews story, which is centered on the Danzig / Stutthof camp, is false. “We don’t have any evidence that the Nazis actually manufactured soap with human bodies. . . it was a cruel rumor...”

One German from Danzig, Dr. Rudolf Spanner, was even prosecuted after the war for making this “Jewish fat soap.” Fortunately for him, the charge was quietly dropped, after much publicity so that the story became firmly embedded in the public mind. 

After the soap story was abandoned, the same “witnesses” who spoke of the “gas chamber” at Stutthof were also quietly dropped, and for many years Stutthof was ignored as an “extermination center” completely.

The front of the Stutthof delousing chamber, as can be seen today. Note the heating oven next to the door. This provided heat to a shelf on the inside of the delousing chamber to activate the Zyklon-B pellets which were laid down on the shelf.“

 The interior of the Stutthoff delousing chamber, as can be seen today. The heated shelf upon which the Zyklon-B crystals would have been spread is clearly visible.

Asked why the camp detainees were so thin, the defendant reportedly said food was so scarce for everyone that two soldiers could fit into a uniform.

The defendant will make a statement during the course of the trial, his lawyer told national news agency DPA.

Tuesday, January 30, 2018

The Myth of the Wannsee Conference Also Now Free

Francis Dupont's excellent book The Myth of the Wannsee Conference (another book "banned" by Amazon in the Great Purge) is now available free to read.

The book contains a full English translation of the entire Wannsee Protocol, and a complete German original for comparison.

It shows clearly that the Wannsee Conference only spoke about deporting Jews to the East, and not about killing or mass murder at all.

You can find the book online here.

You can download the book here.

Saturday, January 27, 2018

7th Edition Released Free to Read in Response to Amazon Censorship

I am happy to announce that the very latest edition of The Six Million: Fact or Fiction? (7th edition) has now been released free to read on the internet.

I have taken this step in response to the decision by Amazon worldwide to ban the book from sale on that platform, in response to agitation from assorted Jewish organizations, including the ADL and Yad Vanshem.

The Jewish organizations said in their pleas to Amazon to ban the book that the "threats against Jewish Community Centers" which were so rife in the US in 2017 were "evidence of rising anti-Semitism" and that therefore books like The Six Million: Fact or Fiction? needed to be removed from the public arena.

As everyone now knows, the "threats against the Jewish Community Centers" all came from a Jew, Micheal Ron David Kadar, in Israel, who was only arrested after the US sent the FBI to that country, because the Israeli police had not acted against him.

When he was arrested, it turned out he had over $250K in bitcoin, payment for the thousands of threats to Jewish centers all over the world, all very handily providing the excuse of "rising anti-Semitism" to ban books...

Needless to say, when the US asked Israel to extradite Kadar, the request was refused.

So it turned out that it was all a set-up, albeit one with which Amazon played along willingly.

In reaction to this draconian and unwarranted censorship, I have waited until International Holocaust Remembrance Day, January 27, 2018, to prepare and release free on the Internet the very latest updated edition of The Six Million: Fact or Fiction?

I will also be releasing PDF and ebook versions, and soon a torrent file as well.

The book is being released for non-commercial purposes only, so please respect that.

If you want to support my efforts, please do consider buying a hard copy from the brave booksellers who still stock the book (click on the advertisement to the right please).

The censors must know that we will never back down until this wall of lies collapses under its own weight. Banning books off Amazon is merely an indication of the fact that they know their claims cannot stand up to rational investigation. Now is the time to increase the pressure!

Friday, January 27, 2017

Yad Vashem Sited on Deir Yassin Massacre Site

It is worthwhile, on yet another “International Holocaust Remembrance Day,” to consider perhaps one of the greatest acts of chutzpah: siting Israel’s official “holocaust memorial” on a site directly overlooking Deir Yassin—a Palestinian village whose population was murdered out of existence in exactly the way that the Holocaust Storytellers claim happened to Jews in World War II.

The massacre at Deir Yassin took place on April 9, 1948, when around 120 Jewish terrorists from the Zionist terrorist groups, the Irgun Zevai Leumi and Lohamei Herut, attacked the village without warning.

The attack was carried out not as part of some ongoing “war,” but merely because the Zionists were then currently busy with an ethnic cleansing program to drive the Palestinians out of all land which had been earmarked to become Israel.

As described on the official Deir Yassin remembrance site, the village of Deir Yassin lay outside of the area to be assigned by the United Nations to the Jewish State, and it had a peaceful reputation.
But, Deir Yassin’s “sin” was that it was located on high ground in the corridor between Tel Aviv and Jerusalem.

Deir Yassin had been slated for occupation under the infamous “Plan D,”—a formal plan drawn up by the Zionist movement by Israel’s first Prime Minister, David Ben-Gurion, in 1947.

Plan D, or “Plan Dalet”—named after the fourth letter in the Hebrew alphabet—was launched six weeks prior to the end of the British Mandate in Palestine. It was called Plan D because it had been preceded by Plan A (February 1945), Plan B (May 1947) and Plan C (November 1947), all of which had been designed to expedite the ethnic cleansing of Palestine to make way for Jewish settlement.

Plan D consisted of at least 13 separate military underground operations which were carried out by the “Palmach”—the elite fighting force of the Haganah, the underground Jewish army—which were set to be put into action before Arab forces entered the areas allotted to the Palestinians by the United Nations Partition Plan.

For this purpose, the Haganah created a “Committee for Arab Properties in Villages,” the purpose of which was to register and take possession of all Palestinian properties in the villages the Zionist forces had conquered. Similar committees were established in major Palestinian cities like Haifa, Safad, Yafa and Tabariyah.

Early in the morning of Friday, April 9, 1948, commandos of the Irgun, headed by Menachem Begin, and the Stern Gang attacked Deir Yassin, a village with about 750 Palestinian residents. 

Most sources put the number of dead at 254, including 25 pregnant women who were bayoneted and 52 children who were maimed in front of their mothers before being beheaded and the mothers slain.

Rape, mutilation and humiliation were the norm, according to survivors. Mahmoud Kassem El-Yassini, who was 5 at the time, said in his testimony that “there were [corpses of] women lying in houses with their skirts torn up to their waists and their legs wide apart; children with their throats cut open, rows of young men shot in the back after being lined up at an execution wall. There were even bodies of babies.”

 El-Yassini recalls, "I remember hearing a Jewish terrorist who was touring the village and reporting the massacre, saying, 'Minus 15 Arabs. Minus 60 Arabs.' After a while his message on the radio to headquarters became: 'It's difficult to count.'"

According to eye-witness Abu Yousef, who was 21, "after the battle, the Jews took elderly men and women and youths, including four of my cousins and a nephew. They took them all. Women who had on them gold and money were stripped of their gold. After the Jews had removed their dead and wounded, they took the men to the quarry and sprayed them all with bullets... One woman saw her son taken some 40 to 60 meters away from where she and the rest of the women stood, and shot dead. Then they brought Jewish kids to throw stones at his body. Then, they poured kerosene over his body and set it ablaze, while the women watched from a distance."

Twenty-five male villagers were loaded into trucks, paraded through the Zakhron Yosef quarter in Jerusalem in front of cheering Jewish crowds, and then taken to a stone quarry along the road between Givat Shaul and Deir Yassin and shot to death. The remaining residents were driven to Arab East Jerusalem. 

A final body count of 254 was reported by The New York Times on April 13, a day after the dead were buried.

At least ten houses were dynamited, and the local cemetery bulldozed. Within months, the area was resettled with Jews from Poland, Rumania, and Slovakia—who had all “miraculously” escaped the “gas chambers”—and the village was renamed Givat Shaul Bet.

Deir Yassin was wiped off the map. As Jerusalem expanded, the land of Deir Yassin became part of the city and is now known simply as the area between Givat Shaul and the settlement of Har Nof on the western slopes of the mountain. 

Today, the site of the massacre of Deir Yassin is contained within the grounds of the Kfar Shaul Mental Health Center, a mental asylum—for Jews only, of course—in Givat Shaul.

Kfar Shaul Mental Health Center, which incorporates the remaining buildings from the village of Deir Yassin.

What makes the site even more poignant is that it is located just 2,000 feet away from the front of Israel’s holocaust museum, Yad Vashem. 

Visitors to Yad Vashem will look out directly at the massacre site from the front of the “Holocaust Memorial.”

Deir Yassin as seen from Yad Vashem; the village lies in the green trees to the right of the water tower.

Yad Vashem, and Deir Yassin, circled. Google Map view, 2016.
It has to be the ultimate act of Chutzpah: to locate a memorial to an alleged Jewish holocaust at the site of a very real holocaust carried out by Zionist terrorists against Palestinians.

The siting of Yad Vashem at this spot reveals much about the psychology behind the Holocaust Storytellers, and how they view the world.

Tuesday, November 8, 2016

The Six Million: Fact or Fiction Sixth Edition Released

The new sections include:

- The dismissal of the Wannsee Conference “extermination plan” as a “silly story” by Yad Vashem’s Professor Yehuda Bauer;

- An expansion of the section dealing with the fake “Gas Chamber 1” on display at the Auschwitz Camp;

- A new section exposing the hoax of the “gassing of the Hungarian Jews” and their dispersal to labor camps in Germany;

- Erich von dem Bach-Zelewski’s evidence at the Eichmann trial;

- A new section dealing with the “eye-witness” evidence of Rudolf Reder from Belzec;

- The admission by Anne Frank’s father that he co-authored the book now known as the “Diary of Anne Frank”; and

- An extract from the Korherr Report which reveals that as of December 1942, there were only 9,127 Jews in all the concentration camps.

In addition, the previous appendices dealing with “survivor hoaxes” has been incorporated into the “Eyewitness” chapter.

This work is without doubt the single most important revisionist overview of the legend of the “Six Million” Holocaust ever yet published.

Just some of the amazing revelations in this book include: 

- How Zionists and Nazis cooperated before the war on writing Germany’s racial laws—and in the setting up of Jewish settlements in Palestine; 

- How Zionists offered to take up arms for Nazi Germany against Britain during World War II;

- How Nazi policy was first aimed at encouraging Jews to emigrate, and then after the war broke out, to evacuating them east of the Urals; 

- How official German records shows that there were 4.5 million Jews under Nazi control, and of that number, 4.3 million lodged claims as “Holocaust victims” after the war; 

- How the Soviet Union used torture to produce the lion’s share of “confessions” extracted from Germans to support the “extermination” allegations; 

- How the Jewish lead prosecutor in the “Einsatzgruppen” trials publicly admitted to having witnessed torture and personally used death threats to extract “confessions”; 

- Exactly what Adolf Eichmann Confessed to—and what he did not; 

- The shocking lies and distortions contained in the two John Demjanjuk trials; 

- How the Auschwitz Camp Museum has formally admitted that the “gas chamber” it has shown to millions of tourists is actually a fake; 

- How original German architect plans of Auschwitz show no “gas chambers”; 

- How forensic chemical examination of Auschwitz has disproved the use of Zyklon-B in the so-called “ruined gas chambers”; 

- How official Israeli and Polish university archaeological digs at Belzec and Sobibór have failed to find any evidence of “gas chambers”; and of how a similar dig at Chelmno directly contradicted “eyewitness” testimony; 

- How the “gas chambers” at Majdanek have glass windows, baths, and real showers for the alleged “victims”; 

- How the “carbon monoxide” gas bottles on display at Majdanek, still connected to a “gas chamber,” are in fact engraved and marked as “carbon dioxide!”; 

- Details of the “Star of David gas chamber tile” hoax at the 2013 Treblinka archaeological dig; 

- How a delousing chamber at Dachau has been misrepresented as a homicidal gas chamber; 

- How German POWs were forced to alter a shower room at Sachenhausen to support a Soviet show trial—but that the forgery was so crude and embarrassing that the Communists knocked down the building in 1952.

- The Bergen-Belsen camp is also reviewed, along with an explanation of the typhus epidemic which swept the camp in the last months of the war and created the horror images of emaciated dead bodies now associated with “the Holocaust.” 

This new version also deals with the “eyewitness survivor” memoirs and their outright lies and forgery, starting with a superbly illustrated expose of the faked memoirs of “Nazi hunter” Simon Wiesenthal and many others. 

Finally, the last section discusses the all-important question of how and why the Holocaust storytellers have gone through so much trouble to make up the incredible story of the “Six Million.” 

If you only ever read one book about the Holocaust, this has to be it. 

180+ illustrations. October 2016 Sixth Edition.



Section 1: Nazi Anti-Semitism and Jewish Emigration from Greater Germany 1933–1940
Section 2: Zionist and Nazi Collaboration on the 1935 Nuremberg Laws
Section 3: “A Nazi Travels to Palestine”—How the SS Supported the Zionist Colonization of Palestine
Section 4: Nazi Financial Assistance to Zionism: The “Haavara” Transfer Agreement
Section 5: The Jewish Declaration of War against Germany and the Organized Boycott of German Goods
Section 6: The Truth about Kristallnacht
Section 7: The Creation of the Concentration Camps
Section 8: Zionists Offered to Fight for the Nazis against the British

Section 9: There Were 4.5 Million Jews under Direct Nazi Control
Section 10: 4.3 Million Postwar “Holocaust Claims” against German Government
Section 11: Yad Vashem’s “Victim List” Compiled on Hearsay
Section 12: Dieter Wisliceny and Wilhelm Höttl—Spurious Origin of the “Six Million” Number
Section 13: Jewish Holocaust Scholar Raul Hilberg Reduces Total Death Toll to 2.8 Million—but Media Still use the “Six Million” Figure
Section 14: Auschwitz “Death Toll” Officially Reduced by 2.5 Million—but the “Six Million” Figure Remains
Section 15: The Shrinking Number of Dead at Auschwitz: From 9 Million to 73,000
Section 16: The Korherr Report—Only 9,127 Jews in Camps as of December 1942

Section 17: The Outrageous Lies and Distortions of the “Kurt Gerstein Statement”
Section 18: Jewish Scholars and Yad Vashem Forced to Deny “Soap,” “Lampshades” Horror Stories
Section 19: What was Really Said at the Wannsee Conference in 1942
Section 20: Wannsee “A Silly Story,” says Israel’s Leading Holocaust Scholar
Section 21: What the “Final Solution” Actually Meant: Deportation to the East
Section 22: Hitler’s 1939 “Threat to the Jews” Speech
Section 23: What Hitler Said about the “Extermination” Rumors
Section 24: Himmler’s 1943 Posen Speech and the Meaning of “Ausrotten”
Section 25: Himmler’s Personal Correspondence Never Mentions “Extermination” Claims
Section 26: The Bad Arolsen “International Tracing Service” Archives Provides No Evidence of any Mass Murder Program

Section 27: The Legally-Flawed Nuremberg “War Crimes Trials” Did Not “Prove” the Holocaust
Section 28: The Katyn Massacre—How the Soviets Tortured Nazis to “Obtain Confessions”
Section 29: Official “Holocaust” Journal Admits Soviet Torture used to Obtain Nazi “Confessions”

Section 30: Anti-Partisan Warfare—The Real Purpose of the Einsatzgruppen (“Task Forces”)
Section 31: Benjamin Ferencz, Jewish Chief Prosecutor at the Einsatzgruppen Trials, Admits to Using Forced Confessions and Death Threats
Section 32: The Einsatzgruppen Ereignismeldungen (“Event Reports”)
Section 33: The Babi Yar Massacre in Kiev: Wartime Aerial Photography Exposes the Lie
Section 34: The “Confession”—and Retraction—of Einsatzgruppen Commander Otto Ohlendorf
Section 35: The Wildly Varying Numbers of Einsatzgruppen “Victims”—1 to 3 million
Section 36: The Oswald Pohl “Confessions”—Example of the Nuremberg Miscarriage of Justice
Section 37: The Perjured Testimony of Erich von dem Bach-Zelewski
Section 38: Bach-Zelewski Repudiates his “Confession”

Section 39: Eichmann Only Admitted Deporting Jews, Never Murdering Them
Section 40: Eichmann’s Doctored “Memoirs”

Section 41: John Demjanjuk—Acquitted in Israel!
Section 42: “Survivor” Testimony Identifies Demjanjuk—But Israeli Supreme Court Dismisses them as Liars
Section 43: German Court Ignores Israeli Decision

Section 44: Why Would Anyone “Confess?”
Section 45: The Suchomel “Confession” in Claude Lanzmann’s “Shoah” Movie

Section 46: Only Six Alleged “Extermination Camps” to “Kill Millions”

Section 47: Auschwitz Founded as a POW Camp for Polish Soldiers in 1940
Section 48: The Auschwitz I “Gas Chamber”
Section 49: Auschwitz Museum Finally Admits that “Gas Chamber” Was Built After the War
Section 50: Auschwitz II: Architect’s Plans Show No “Gas Chambers”
Section 51: Real Showers in Auschwitz and the “Gas through the Shower-head” Legend
Section 52: Steam Disinfection Stations for Prisoner Clothing as Part of the Anti-Typhus Measures
Section 53: Delousing Chambers Used in All Camps
Section 54: The Auschwitz Clothing Dis-infestation Station Known as the “Central Sauna”
Section 55: The Real Auschwitz Gas Chambers—The “Kanada I” Delousing Chambers
Section 56: Pictures of the Kanada I Zyklon-B Delousing Center in Action
Section 57: Forensic Investigation of “Gas Chamber” Ruins Reveals No Evidence of Gassings
Section 58: Rudolf Report Confirms Forensic Evidence
Section 59: The Auschwitz “Gas Chambers” Change Location
Section 60: The “Gassing of the Hungarian Jews”
Section 61: The Auschwitz Transit Camp
Section 62: Auschwitz’s Real Purpose—A Labor Camp
Section 63: The Rudolf Höss Memoirs
Section 64: Photographs of Auschwitz Inmates Belie Mass Gassing Allegations
Section 65: The Auschwitz Swimming Pool
Section 66: The Frankfurt Auschwitz Trial of 1963

Section 67: Details Unknown for Decades
Section 68: The Höfle Telegram
Section 69: Problems with “Gassing by Diesel”
Section 70: The Purpose of the Reinhard Camps

Section 71: Chelmno—“Operational” for 18 Months
Section 72: Yad Vashem’s Ostrowski “Gas Van”
Section 73: Walter Rauff and the “Gas Vans”
Section 74: Forensic Digs Contradict “Official History” by Finding “Crematoria” in Chelmno
Section 75: The Chelmno Trials

Section 76: The Belzec Camp—Given Little Prominence Because of Unbelievable Allegations
Section 77: Fantastic Claims from Most Famous “Eyewitness Survivor” Rudolf Reder
Section 78: Belzec’s Incredible Execution Methods: “Electrocution and Drowning in Excrement”
Section 79: The Belzec Trial
Section 80: Forensic Digs at Belzec Contradict “Official” History and Fail to Find “Gas Chambers”

Section 81: Sobibór—A Temporary Camp Which Only Existed for 15 Months
Section 82: Chlorine and Electricity: “Survivors” Claim Bizarre Execution Methods in Sobibór
Section 83: Yitzhak Arad’s Contradictory Official History of Sobibór
Section 84: Official Documents Show Sobibór’s True Function
Section 85: The Sobibór Trials
Section 86: Archaeological Digs Fail To Find Sobibór “Gas Chamber”
Section 87: 2014 Archaeological Dig Contradicts Earlier “Gas Chamber” Claims

Section 88: Treblinka—Another Temporary Camp Which Only Existed for 15 Months
Section 89: Treblinka I and II—Labor and Transit Area
Section 90: The Famous “Black Book of Polish Jewry” Claims Execution by “Steam” in Treblinka
Section 91: US National Archive Aerial Photography of Treblinka Shows No Sign of “Extermination Camp
Section 92: “Survivors” Claim Execution by “Vacuum Chambers”
Section 93: First 1999 Forensic Examination of Treblinka Site Reveals No Mass Graves
Section 94: The 2010 Second Forensic Analysis of Treblinka Reveals No “Mass Graves”
Section 95: The 2013 Third Forensic Analysis of Treblinka and the “Star of David Gas Chamber Tiles” Hoax
Section 96: The “Evidence” of “Treblinka Guard” Paval Leleko
Section 97: The Franz Stangl Trial and His “Memoirs”

Section 98: Majdanek, Lublin—Originally Built as POW Camp for Soviet Army Prisoners
Section 99: First Majdanek Show Trial, 1944
Section 100: Number of Madjanek “Victims” Varies Wildly from 1.7 Million to 79,000
Section 101: “Gas Chamber” Added to Postwar Rebuilt Madjanek Crematorium Building
Section 102: The Impossibility of the Majdanek “Gas Chambers”
Section 103: Majdanek’s Real Showers for “Gassing Victims”
Section 104: Majdanek’s “Gas Bottles” on Display are Carbon Dioxide, Not Carbon Monoxide
Section 105: The Anomalies of Majdanek’s Second and Third “Gas Chambers”
Section 106: The Plain Glass Window in Majdanek’s Fourth “Gas Chamber”
Section 107: The “Harvest Festival” Hoax
Section 108: The Mußfeldt “Confession”
Section 109: The Second Majdanek Trial of 1975

Section 110: Dachau and Its Mysterious “Gas Chamber”
Section 111: The Real Dachau Gas Chambers— Delousing Cubicles
Section 112: Dachau Casualty Figures Officially “Reduced” from 238,000 to 20,000

Section 113: Sachsenhausen: Gas Chamber Built in November 1945, Knocked Down in 1952

Section 114: Typhus Deaths—Origin of Horror Images in Bergen-Belsen—No Gas Chambers

Section 115: Simon Wiesenthal’s Faked “Memoirs”
Section 116: The Diary of Anne Frank—Handwriting Reveals Two Authors
Section 117: Anne Frank Fund Admits Father Co-Authored Diary
Section 118: Rudolf Vrba’s “I Cannot Forgive”
Section 119: Olga Lengyel’s “Five Chimneys”
Section 120: Kitty Hart’s “Return to Auschwitz”
Section 121: Martin Gray’s “For Those I Loved”
Section 122: Jean Francis Steiner’s “Treblinka”
Section 123: Miklos Nyiszli’s “Auschwitz: A Doctor’s Eyewitness Account”
Section 124: Filip Müller’s “Eyewitness Auschwitz: Three Years in the Gas Chambers”
Section 125: Truthful Survivor Books Not Given Prominence
Section 126: Paul Rassinier—The Holocaust Victim Who Argued Against the “Gas Chambers”
Section 127: Martin Gilbert’s “Auschwitz and the Allies”
Section 128: Klara Markus, and the Psychology behind “Holocaust Survivor Testimonies”
Section 129: Herman Rosenblat’s “Angel at the Fence”
Section 130: Binjamin Wilkomirski’s “Fragments”
Section 131: “Survivor” Swindlers 1—The Philip Auerbach Case
Section 132: “Survivor” Swindlers 2—The Werner Nachmann Case
Section 133: “Survivor” Swindlers 3—The Semen Domnitser Case

Section 134: Bears and Eagles in Cages Eating Jews; Jewish “Soap Burial” in Atlanta, USA; Sausages Made out of Jews; Mummified Thumbs as Light Switches; “Pedal-driven Brain-bashing Machines”—And More, All in Nuremberg Court as “Evidence.”

Section 135: The “Holocaust”—What Actually Happened
Section 136: Why Was the Holocaust Story Invented?
Appendix 1: Alois Brunner and the “I Would Do It All Again” Lie
Appendix 2: The Oskar Groening “I Saw the Gas Chambers” Story
Appendix 3: Auschwitz—Reality versus the Claims